How Much of Your Time Does an R&D Credit Study Actually Take?
The most common reason owners pass on the R&D credit is not doubt about eligibility. It is the assumption that a study will eat their team's quarter. Here is what it really asks of you.

TL;DR
- The usual objection to the R&D credit is bandwidth, not eligibility, and it is generally overstated.
- Your team's involvement is measured in hours, not weeks. Most of the work sits with the provider.
- What moves the calendar is how quickly you get your existing records over, not how complicated your business is.
The federal R&D tax credit under IRC Section 41 rewards companies for the technical problem-solving they already do. Most owners we talk to have a rough sense of that, and it is not usually where the conversation stalls.
Where it stalls is bandwidth. My engineers are already underwater. My controller is already stretched. I am not handing anyone a month-long tax project in the middle of our busy season.
That is a reasonable concern, and it deserves a straight answer rather than reassurance.
The short version
A study typically runs about four to eight weeks from start to delivery, depending on the specifics of your business and how many years are in scope.
Your team's actual hands-on involvement across that window is much smaller than the calendar suggests. Think in terms of hours, not weeks. The bulk of the elapsed time is analysis and documentation work happening on the provider's side, not tasks sitting in your queue.
Those timeframes are typical averages. The terms of any particular engagement are governed by its engagement agreement.
What gets asked of you
Three things, broadly.
Records you already have. A study is built from your existing financial and project documentation. Nothing has to be created from scratch, and nothing requires your team to start tracking something new. If you can produce it from the systems you already run, that is the bar.
A short input from the people who did the work. Determining how much of your team's effort went toward qualifying activity requires hearing from your team, briefly. This is a light lift per person, and it is the step that turns a rough estimate into something supportable.
A conversation with whoever is closest to the technical work. Usually the owner, an engineer, or a lead developer. The purpose is to understand what you were trying to build, what you did not know how to do at the outset, and how you worked through it. This is the part that captures the story behind the numbers, and it is a conversation rather than an audit.
That is the shape of it. A good provider structures each of these to be bounded and scheduled around you, not open-ended.
What you get at the end
A credit figure on its own is not worth much. What makes a claim hold up is the documentation behind it.
A complete study should deliver the credit computation, the required tax forms including Form 6765, and a written explanation of how the number was reached, project by project. That last piece is the one that matters most if the claim is ever examined, because it lets someone who was not in the room follow the reasoning.
Your CPA or preparer then incorporates the credit into your return. A study should hand off cleanly, with the support attached, so your preparer is not reverse-engineering anything. At Strata we speak with your CPA directly, so you are not stuck relaying technical detail between two parties.
What actually drives the calendar
Not the complexity of your business. Not how many projects you run. What drives it is how quickly your existing records get over to the provider.
The analysis cannot start until the underlying material is in hand. A company that pulls its documentation together in a week is at the short end of the range. A company that takes a month to do the same has simply added a month, and no amount of speed later in the process makes it up.
This is worth knowing because it is the one variable you fully control.
When to start
There is no single right time of year to begin a study. What matters is where you are relative to your own filing date.
For calendar-year filers, the original deadlines generally fall around March 15 for partnerships and S corporations and April 15 for C corporations and individuals. Filers who extend generally move to around September 15 and October 15 respectively. Fiscal-year filers work off a different schedule entirely. The IRS tax calendar lays out the standard dates, but confirm yours with your preparer, since they vary by entity type, year end, and any relief in effect.
From there the math is simple. Back up four to eight weeks for the study itself, then add however long it realistically takes your team to pull its records together. Roughly two months ahead of whichever date applies to you gives everyone room to work without the request landing in the middle of your busiest stretch.
If your filing date for the current year has already passed, that does not necessarily mean waiting twelve months. Prior years may still be open depending on your filing history, and a study can often look back across more than one year at once. Whether that is worth doing is a conversation about your specific situation.
Shorter runways are workable, and a good provider will tell you plainly whether your timeline is feasible before you commit. The advantage of starting early is simply that it is easier on your team.
What to ask any provider
Whether you work with Strata or someone else, these are fair questions before you sign anything:
- Will you talk to our technical staff directly, or work only from forms?
- Will we receive a written explanation of how the credit was calculated, and will it stand on its own?
- Will you identify work that does not qualify and exclude it?
- Will you coordinate with our CPA?
- What happens if the claim is examined, and what is your role then?
A provider that answers those clearly is describing how they work. A provider that leads with a projected credit amount before doing any work is describing a sales pitch. Under Treasury Regulation 1.41-4, qualification turns on the specific facts of your activities and how they are documented, which is not something anyone can responsibly quote before looking.
Where to start
If you are trying to work out whether a study makes sense for your business, the initial assessment is built for exactly that question and costs nothing. It is a conversation about what your team builds and where the technical uncertainty lives, and it ends with a straight answer either way.
Talk to Strata about an initial assessment.
This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute tax or legal advice. Consult a qualified tax professional regarding your specific circumstances.
Author
Strata R&D Tax Group



